1. Yet ,, within the genealogy, most of us knowthat per signal discover an exception. A beneficial vexing part ofgenealogy is that no one really knows how to put on the brand new exceptions orrules which have any definitive adjective particularly usually, perhaps, probably,more than likely, an such like. It will be interesting if the around other examples ofjointures are produced annually or two just after a known matrimony day.
2. Is there a keen extant dispensation on the wedding regarding ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes who had been third cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh or fourth cousins, immediately after taken from this new 5th LordClifford? That would restrict its relationships big date.
Arthur
Presumably, if a good dispensation try tried and supplied, it can havebeen of the among the after the, and could appear in the newest correspondingregister publication, whether it survives:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop out of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop Tucson, AZ female off Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop away from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop off Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop off Carlisle 1509-1520
5. Should your tenth Lord Clifford really does marry during the early 1487 [state January] andhas E afterwards in this 12 months, really does the new chronology not really works?
John hands?
Elizabeth created from inside the later 1487, Henry produced into the 1488/9, Joan inside ,etc. filling in the latest brands of the posting of . If (a) thechronology still works; and (b) their own marriage section was not lower; thenwe just have the brand new 1505 pedigree out-of Henry VII’s that is from inside the oppositionto brand new conjecture you to definitely she is actually a legitimate child.
six. Regarding the 1505 pedigree: May be the Clifford daughters the fresh onlyknown Henry VII affairs excluded? Were there someone else? If so,wouldn’t you to definitely mirror defectively on this document since the a resource?
From comparisons You will find produced from the c.1505 Henry VII Interactions pedigreeswith the newest 1480-1500 Visitation of the North pedigrees, which happen to be
Regarding c.1505 Relations pedigrees, new Clifford children are not listedin an effective Clifford pedigree, but alternatively throughout the St. John pedigree. Since the I’mnot accustomed new St. John nearest and dearest, following is the suggestions asit appears from the c.1505 pedigree, since the taken from brand new 1834 Coll. Greatest. etGen. post. This new phrasing in the quotations is exactly as it seems inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).
“Zero. XII.”Regarding my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Rod, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess from Somerset got three husbands.” By the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My Woman the fresh new King’s Mom.” who had “The fresh King.” whohad “Prince “By the “Sir Oliver Saint John, first spouse.” she had 3 daus & dos sons:
A beneficial. “Edith, married to help you Geoffrey Pole off Buckinghamshire.” They had:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. married towards Lady Margaret, dau. of theDuke of Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded so you can Ralph Verney, Esq.” They had: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[an alternate youngster, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He had five children:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Four daughters and you will oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you’re able to Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and you may heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “E, married to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. regarding Lincolnshire.”B4. “A Nun from Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, wedded to Sir Richard Frognall.” They’d:C1. “Edmond Frognall along with his brethren and you may sistren.” Having issueindicated, not entitled.C2. “Elizabeth, wedded to help you Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “E, wedded earliest to the Lord Zouche; shortly after with the LordScrope regarding Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by Zouche] ” Catesby.” That they had:”E. George. John. William.”D2. [from the Scrope] ” Conyers.” With issueindicated but not named.
Margaret Duchess of Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, last spouse.”had: “John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. out of K. Edward IV.” andthey got “Elizabeth.”